Aster Healthcare Ltd v Shafi (Estate of) [2014] EWHC 77 (QB) (24 January 2014)
Section 7 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not impose liability on the estate of an incapacitated person for care home fees where the provider did not intend the person or their estate to pay, and where services were provided under arrangements with a local authority. The summary judgment against the estate was wrongly granted and must be set aside for trial.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 77
- Parties
- Claimant and Respondent: Aster Healthcare Limited; Defendant and Appellant: The Estate of Mr Mohammed Shafi (By its Representative Mrs Batool Shafi)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; summary judgment set aside; matter to proceed to trial.
- Legal Topics
- Liability for Care Home Fees, Mental Capacity Act 2005 Section 7, National Assistance Act 1948 Part III, Community Care Act 1990, Obligations of Local Authorities, Supply of Necessaries to Incapacitated Persons, Summary Judgment, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aster Healthcare Limited
Claimant and Respondent
The Estate of Mr Mohammed Shafi (By its Representative Mrs Batool Shafi)
Defendant and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Who is legally liable for payment of care home fees for an incapacitated person: the estate or the local authority?
- 2 Does section 7 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 impose liability on the estate where the provider did not intend the incapacitated person to pay?
- 3 What is the effect of the National Assistance Act 1948 and related guidance on local authority obligations?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 does not impose liability on the estate of an incapacitated person for care home fees where the provider did not intend the person or their estate to pay, and where services were provided under arrangements with a local authority. The summary judgment against the estate was wrongly granted and must be set aside for trial.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; summary judgment set aside; matter to proceed to trial.
Orders
- Order for summary judgment in favour of the Claimant set aside in its entirety.
- Matter remitted for trial on all issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment