Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust
The claimant’s injuries did not arise from any danger due to the state of the premises but from his own deliberate and dangerous activity. The fire escape was not inherently dangerous, and the Trust owed no duty under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 in these circumstances.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Martyn Keown; Defendant/appellant: Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; trial judgment set aside; claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Liability to Trespassers, Duty of Care, Contributory Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martyn Keown
Claimant/respondent
Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant NHS Trust owed a duty of care to the claimant, a child trespasser, under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 for injuries suffered while climbing a fire escape.
- 2 Whether the risk of injury arose due to the state of the premises or the claimant's own actions.
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant’s injuries did not arise from any danger due to the state of the premises but from his own deliberate and dangerous activity. The fire escape was not inherently dangerous, and the Trust owed no duty under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; trial judgment set aside; claim dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The order of the trial judge is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment