Kearns v Kemp & Anor [2013] EWHC 4093 (QB) (05 December 2013)
The claimant's conduct became unreasonable after 10 May 2013, justifying indemnity costs for the first defendant's costs incurred after that date; prior costs and all second defendant's costs are to be assessed on the standard basis. Payments on account are ordered to prevent the receiving parties from being kept out of their money.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 4093
- Parties
- Claimant: Kirby Kearns; First Defendant: Lesley Kemp; Second Defendant: Twitter Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (libel) / Post Discontinuance Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs order following discontinuance; partial indemnity costs for first defendant; standard basis for other costs; payments on account ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Costs, Security for Costs, Indemnity Costs, Standard Basis Costs, Discontinuance, Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kirby Kearns
Claimant
Lesley Kemp
First Defendant
Twitter Inc
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (libel) / Post Discontinuance Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be assessed on the standard or indemnity basis for the first defendant
- 2 Appropriate payment on account of costs to the first and second defendants
- 3 Assessment of conduct justifying indemnity costs
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's conduct became unreasonable after 10 May 2013, justifying indemnity costs for the first defendant's costs incurred after that date; prior costs and all second defendant's costs are to be assessed on the standard basis. Payments on account are ordered to prevent the receiving parties from being kept out of their money.
Court Disposition
Costs order following discontinuance; partial indemnity costs for first defendant; standard basis for other costs; payments on account ordered.
Orders
- Claimant to pay first defendant's costs (standard basis up to 10 May 2013, indemnity basis thereafter, including appeal and security for costs application), subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
- Claimant to pay second defendant's costs on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment