Kearns v Kemp & Anor [2013] EWHC 4093 (QB) (05 December 2013)
Claimant's conduct became unreasonable after 10 May 2013, justifying indemnity costs for first defendant's costs incurred thereafter; costs before that date and for second defendant to be assessed on standard basis. Payments on account ordered to prevent delay in receiving costs.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 4093 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kirby Kearns; First Defendant: Lesley Kemp; Second Defendant: Twitter Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (libel) / Costs Determination Following Discontinuance
- Outcome
- Claimant to pay first defendant's costs (standard basis up to 10 May 2013, indemnity basis thereafter), and second defendant's costs (standard basis). Payments on account ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Costs Assessment, Security for Costs, Jurisdiction, Discontinuance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kirby Kearns
Claimant
Lesley Kemp
First Defendant
Twitter Inc
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (libel) / Costs Determination Following Discontinuance
Legal Issues
- 1 Basis for assessment of costs (standard vs indemnity)
- 2 Payment on account of costs
- 3 Conduct of parties relevant to costs
Ratio Decidendi
Claimant's conduct became unreasonable after 10 May 2013, justifying indemnity costs for first defendant's costs incurred thereafter; costs before that date and for second defendant to be assessed on standard basis. Payments on account ordered to prevent delay in receiving costs.
Court Disposition
Claimant to pay first defendant's costs (standard basis up to 10 May 2013, indemnity basis thereafter), and second defendant's costs (standard basis). Payments on account ordered.
Orders
- Claimant to pay first defendant £82,380 on account of costs within 14 days.
- Claimant to pay second defendant £18,000 on account of costs within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment