Building Register Ltd v Weston & Anor [2014] EWHC 784 (QB) (20 March 2014)
The website publication bore six defamatory meanings of the claimant, two of which were statements of fact and four were comment; the meanings were determined by the impression on the reasonable reader, and the distinction between fact and comment was made by reference to the context and evaluative language used.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 784
- Parties
- Claimant: Building Register Limited; First Defendant: Mark Weston; Second Defendant: All Clean Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action / Preliminary Issues Hearing on Meaning and Fact/opinion Distinction
- Outcome
- Ruling on preliminary issues; no final disposition of the action.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Meaning of Defamatory Words, Fact Vs Comment, Honest Comment Defence, Threshold of Seriousness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Building Register Limited
Claimant
Mark Weston
First Defendant
All Clean Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action / Preliminary Issues Hearing on Meaning and Fact/opinion Distinction
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of?
- 2 Are the allegations statements of fact or expressions of opinion (comment)?
- 3 Are the meanings defamatory of the claimant?
Ratio Decidendi
The website publication bore six defamatory meanings of the claimant, two of which were statements of fact and four were comment; the meanings were determined by the impression on the reasonable reader, and the distinction between fact and comment was made by reference to the context and evaluative language used.
Court Disposition
Ruling on preliminary issues; no final disposition of the action.
Orders
- The website publication bears the six meanings set out in paragraph 25 of the judgment.
- Meanings in paragraph 25(2) and (3) are statements of fact; meanings in 25(1), (4), (5), and (6) are comment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment