Saïd v Groupe L'Express & Anor [2018] EWHC 3593 (QB) (21 December 2018)
The English court has jurisdiction to hear the libel claim for damages and injunctive relief relating to publication within England and Wales under the mosaic alternative, as the claimant has a good arguable case that serious harm to reputation has occurred or is likely to occur in the jurisdiction. However, the claimant has not established a good arguable case that England and Wales is his centre of interests for the purposes of an injunction against online publication, given his habitual residence in Monaco and diffuse international connections. The claimant is entitled to pursue an injunction regarding print publication but not for online publication.
- Citation
- [2018] EWHC 3593 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Wafic Rida Saïd; First Defendant: Groupe L'Express; Second Defendant: Guillaume Dubois
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Claim / Jurisdiction Challenge (application to Contest Jurisdiction)
- Outcome
- Court has jurisdiction for libel claim relating to publication within England and Wales; claimant may pursue damages and injunction for print publication but not for online publication.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Jurisdiction, Serious Harm, Injunctions, Publication, Centre of Interests, Mosaic Alternative, Freedom of Expression
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wafic Rida Saïd
Claimant
Groupe L'Express
First Defendant
Guillaume Dubois
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Claim / Jurisdiction Challenge (application to Contest Jurisdiction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the English court have jurisdiction to hear the libel claim against defendants domiciled in France?
- 2 Has the claimant suffered or is likely to suffer serious harm to reputation within England and Wales?
- 3 Is the claimant entitled to an injunction restraining further publication, including online?
Ratio Decidendi
The English court has jurisdiction to hear the libel claim for damages and injunctive relief relating to publication within England and Wales under the mosaic alternative, as the claimant has a good arguable case that serious harm to reputation has occurred or is likely to occur in the jurisdiction. However, the claimant has not established a good arguable case that England and Wales is his centre of interests for the purposes of an injunction against online publication, given his habitual residence in Monaco and diffuse international connections. The claimant is entitled to pursue an injunction regarding print publication but not for online publication.
Court Disposition
Court has jurisdiction for libel claim relating to publication within England and Wales; claimant may pursue damages and injunction for print publication but not for online publication.
Orders
- Claimant permitted to proceed with libel claim for damages and injunction relating to print publication within England and Wales.
- Claimant not permitted to pursue injunction against online publication as centre of interests not established in England and Wales.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment