Burke v Khan & Anor [2023] EWHC 3461 (Ch) (23 May 2023)
The appeal is confined to the costs order of 12 September 2017; permission to appeal other aspects, including the finding of unreasonable conduct and declarations, is refused as it is too late and was expressly excluded by prior judicial order.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 3461 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Simon Burke; Defendant/appellant: Miss Khan; Defendant/appellant: Mrs Khan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal confined to costs order; permission to extend appeal scope refused
- Legal Topics
- Licence to Alter, Costs Orders, Appeal Procedure, Bankruptcy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Burke
Claimant/respondent
Miss Khan
Defendant/appellant
Mrs Khan
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs order of 12 September 2017 was wrong
- 2 Whether the Appellants complied with the Elliott Order
- 3 Whether the Elliott Order was ineffective for lack of time specification
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is confined to the costs order of 12 September 2017; permission to appeal other aspects, including the finding of unreasonable conduct and declarations, is refused as it is too late and was expressly excluded by prior judicial order.
Court Disposition
Appeal confined to costs order; permission to extend appeal scope refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal paragraph 2 of District Judge Parker's order refused
- Appeal limited to costs order of 12 September 2017
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment