Secretary of State for Health and Social Care & Ors v Lundbeck Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 677 (23 May 2025)
A claim transferred from the High Court to the CAT becomes a follow-on claim under section 47A CA 1998 when a Claim Form is filed in accordance with Rule 30 of the CAT Rules. The limitation period is governed by the CAT Rules, not the Limitation Act 1980, and is two years from the date the infringement decision becomes final. The Transfer Order did not contractually estop the Claimants from relying on the CAT limitation period, as there was no clear agreement to that effect.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Civ 677
- Parties
- Claimant / Respondent: The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care; Claimant / Respondent: The National Health Services Business Services Authority; Claimant / Respondent: The Welsh Ministers; Claimant / Respondent: Swansea Bay University Health Board; Claimant / Respondent: Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board; Claimant / Respondent: Aneurin Bevan University Health Board; Claimant / Respondent: Hywel Dda University Health Board; Claimant / Respondent: Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board; Claimant / Respondent: Powys Teaching Health Board; Claimant / Respondent: Cardiff & Vale University Health Board; Defendant / Appellant: Lundbeck Limited; Defendant / Appellant: H. Lundbeck A/S; Defendant / Appellant: Generics (U. K.) Limited; Defendant / Appellant: Merck KGaA; Defendant / Appellant: Arrow Generics Limited; Defendant / Appellant: Arrow Group ApS; Defendant / Appellant: Resolution Chemicals Limited; Defendant / Appellant: Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS; Defendant / Appellant: Alpharma LLC; Defendant / Appellant: A. L. Industrier AS; Defendant / Appellant: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited; Defendant / Appellant: Sun Pharma UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Periods, Follow on Actions, Transfer of Proceedings, Contractual Estoppel, Article 101 TFEU, Competition Act 1998, Enterprise Act 2002
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Claimant / Respondent
The National Health Services Business Services Authority
Claimant / Respondent
The Welsh Ministers
Claimant / Respondent
Swansea Bay University Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Aneurin Bevan University Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Hywel Dda University Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Powys Teaching Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Cardiff & Vale University Health Board
Claimant / Respondent
Lundbeck Limited
Defendant / Appellant
H. Lundbeck A/S
Defendant / Appellant
Generics (U. K.) Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Merck KGaA
Defendant / Appellant
Arrow Generics Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Arrow Group ApS
Defendant / Appellant
Resolution Chemicals Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS
Defendant / Appellant
Alpharma LLC
Defendant / Appellant
A. L. Industrier AS
Defendant / Appellant
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Sun Pharma UK Limited
Defendant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the limitation period for a follow-on claim in the CAT is governed by the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules or the Limitation Act 1980 when proceedings are transferred from the High Court
- 2 Whether the Claimants are contractually estopped by the terms of the Transfer Order from relying on the CAT limitation period
Ratio Decidendi
A claim transferred from the High Court to the CAT becomes a follow-on claim under section 47A CA 1998 when a Claim Form is filed in accordance with Rule 30 of the CAT Rules. The limitation period is governed by the CAT Rules, not the Limitation Act 1980, and is two years from the date the infringement decision becomes final. The Transfer Order did not contractually estop the Claimants from relying on the CAT limitation period, as there was no clear agreement to that effect.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The claim in the CAT is not time-barred and may proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment