Parsonage v Fastway Steel Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1796 (13 November 2001)

Parsonage v Fastway Steel Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1796 (13 November 2001)

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to exercise discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed out of time, as the delay did not cause significant prejudice to the defendant's ability to defend, the case depended largely on expert rather than factual evidence, and the claimant's conduct, while relevant, did not preclude relief.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 1796
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Kevin Parsonage; Defendant/appellant: Fastway Steel Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 November 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) on Preliminary Issue Regarding Limitation Under Limitation Act 1980
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Discretion Under Limitation Act Section 33, Employer's Liability, Negligence, Equitable Relief
Civil Procedure Personal Injury Employment Law Limitation of Actions Discretion Under Limitation Act Section 33 Employer's Liability Negligence Equitable Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Parsonage

Claimant/respondent

Fastway Steel Ltd

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) on Preliminary Issue Regarding Limitation Under Limitation Act 1980

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant's action against his employer for personal injury was time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act to allow the claim to proceed out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge was entitled to exercise discretion under section 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 to allow the claim to proceed out of time, as the delay did not cause significant prejudice to the defendant's ability to defend, the case depended largely on expert rather than factual evidence, and the claimant's conduct, while relevant, did not preclude relief.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of the cross-appeal