DLA Piper Uk LLP v Henshaws Farming LLP & Ors [2025] EWHC 542 (Ch) (17 March 2025)
The applications for strike out and summary judgment are dismissed because the issues of deliberate concealment and reasonable diligence under section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 are inherently fact-sensitive and unsuitable for summary determination. The registration of the 2015 Transfer does not, as a matter of law, preclude a finding of deliberate concealment. The assignment to DLA Piper is not shown to be unenforceable for maintenance or champerty at this stage.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 542 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: DLA Piper UK LLP; 1st Defendant: Henshaws Farming LLP; 2nd Defendant: Benjamin Dean; 3rd Defendant: Stuart Michael Melia; 4th Defendant: Lisa Henshaw; 5th Defendant: Lee Henshaw; 6th Defendant: James Alfred Davidson; 7th Defendant: Myerson Trust Corporation Limited (as administrators of the estate of the late Cyril Ford Middleton Henshaw)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Chancery Division / Application for Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications for strike out and summary judgment dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Deliberate Concealment, Assignment of Claims, Maintenance and Champerty, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DLA Piper UK LLP
Claimant
Henshaws Farming LLP
1st Defendant
Benjamin Dean
2nd Defendant
Stuart Michael Melia
3rd Defendant
Lisa Henshaw
4th Defendant
Lee Henshaw
5th Defendant
James Alfred Davidson
6th Defendant
Myerson Trust Corporation Limited (as administrators of the estate of the late Cyril Ford Middleton Henshaw)
7th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Chancery Division / Application for Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim is barred by limitation under the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the assignment to DLA Piper is unenforceable for maintenance and/or champerty
- 3 Whether the defendants deliberately concealed the 2015 Transfer from the trustees
Ratio Decidendi
The applications for strike out and summary judgment are dismissed because the issues of deliberate concealment and reasonable diligence under section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980 are inherently fact-sensitive and unsuitable for summary determination. The registration of the 2015 Transfer does not, as a matter of law, preclude a finding of deliberate concealment. The assignment to DLA Piper is not shown to be unenforceable for maintenance or champerty at this stage.
Court Disposition
Applications for strike out and summary judgment dismissed.
Orders
- The claim proceeds to trial on all pleaded issues.
- Costs reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment