Jenkins v JCP Solicitors Ltd
The mistake in naming JCP Solicitors Limited instead of John Collins & Partners LLP was a mistake as to name, not identity, as evidenced by contemporaneous documents. The court has jurisdiction to allow substitution under CPR 19.5 for the October/November 2011 advice. The District Judge erred in law in refusing substitution and in considering the merits of the claim at this stage. However, the claim in respect of April 2011 advice was arguably statute-barred at the time of the claim form, so substitution or addition of the LLP for that claim is refused.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Huw Morgan Jenkins; Respondent/defendant: JCP Solicitors Limited; Proposed Defendant: John Collins & Partners LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order Dismissing Substitution Application and Striking Out Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Substitution of Parties, Mistake in Party Name, Professional Negligence by Solicitors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Huw Morgan Jenkins
Appellant/claimant
JCP Solicitors Limited
Respondent/defendant
John Collins & Partners LLP
Proposed Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order Dismissing Substitution Application and Striking Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's mistake was as to the name or identity of the defendant for purposes of substitution under CPR 19.5
- 2 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to allow substitution of John Collins & Partners LLP for JCP Solicitors Limited
- 3 Whether the claim in respect of April 2011 advice was statute-barred at the time of the claim form
Ratio Decidendi
The mistake in naming JCP Solicitors Limited instead of John Collins & Partners LLP was a mistake as to name, not identity, as evidenced by contemporaneous documents. The court has jurisdiction to allow substitution under CPR 19.5 for the October/November 2011 advice. The District Judge erred in law in refusing substitution and in considering the merits of the claim at this stage. However, the claim in respect of April 2011 advice was arguably statute-barred at the time of the claim form, so substitution or addition of the LLP for that claim is refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Orders
- Substitution of John Collins & Partners LLP as defendant in respect of October/November 2011 advice allowed
- Permission to withdraw concession on limitation granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment