Ellen Kay v Martineau Johnson (A firm)
Ms Kay had constructive knowledge of the facts necessary to bring a claim by 2009, or at the latest by 2018, and did not take all reasonable steps to obtain expert advice; impecuniosity did not excuse the delay. Therefore, the claim is statute-barred under section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Ellen Kay; Defendants/respondents: Martineau Johnson (A firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Preliminary Issue (limitation)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; claim is statute-barred.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Solicitor Negligence, Constructive Knowledge, Section 14 a Limitation Act 1980
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ellen Kay
Claimant/appellant
Martineau Johnson (A firm)
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Preliminary Issue (limitation)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for negligence against solicitors is statute-barred under the Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 extends the limitation period based on actual or constructive knowledge
- 3 Whether impecuniosity can delay constructive knowledge under section 14A(10)
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Kay had constructive knowledge of the facts necessary to bring a claim by 2009, or at the latest by 2018, and did not take all reasonable steps to obtain expert advice; impecuniosity did not excuse the delay. Therefore, the claim is statute-barred under section 14A of the Limitation Act 1980.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; claim is statute-barred.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Claim remains struck out as statute-barred
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment