CMA CGM S.A. v Classica Shipping Company Ltd.
The 1976 Convention does not entitle charterers to limit liability for claims brought by shipowners against them where the liability does not arise in the capacity of owner. The structure and language of the Convention, as well as its historical context, indicate that limitation is only available to charterers when acting qua owner, not for contractual liabilities to owners under a charterparty.
- Parties
- Appellant/charterer: CMA CGM S. A.; Respondent/owner: Classica Shipping Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration Award / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Liability, Charterparty, Dangerous Cargo, Interpretation of International Conventions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CMA CGM S. A.
Appellant/charterer
Classica Shipping Company Limited
Respondent/owner
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration Award / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time charterers are entitled to limit their liability to shipowners under the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 and the 1976 Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims for claims arising from the charterparty.
Ratio Decidendi
The 1976 Convention does not entitle charterers to limit liability for claims brought by shipowners against them where the liability does not arise in the capacity of owner. The structure and language of the Convention, as well as its historical context, indicate that limitation is only available to charterers when acting qua owner, not for contractual liabilities to owners under a charterparty.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment