McCoubrey v Ministry of Defence [2006] EWCA Civ 1369 (19 September 2006)
There is a reasonable prospect of success that the judge applied the wrong test to 'significance' under section 14(2) Limitation Act 1980, and permission to appeal should be granted to allow argument on this and, if necessary, section 33.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1369
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Jason Stuart McCoubrey; Defendant/appellant: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (granted)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Knowledge of Injury, Section 14 and Section 33 Limitation Act 1980, Personal Injury Claims Against Ministry of Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Stuart McCoubrey
Claimant/respondent
Ministry of Defence
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant had knowledge of a significant injury before late 2001 for the purposes of section 14(1)(a) Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the judge misapplied the test of 'significance' under section 14(2) Limitation Act 1980
- 3 Whether the judge failed to consider section 33 Limitation Act 1980
Ratio Decidendi
There is a reasonable prospect of success that the judge applied the wrong test to 'significance' under section 14(2) Limitation Act 1980, and permission to appeal should be granted to allow argument on this and, if necessary, section 33.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted to the Ministry of Defence
- Time estimate for appeal should allow for argument on section 33 Limitation Act 1980
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment