Alsaifi v Npower Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 480 (QB) (03 March 2020)
The defamation claim was time-barred under s.4A Limitation Act 1980, no publication to a third party was pleaded, and any internal publication would be protected by qualified privilege. The data protection claim failed as s.10 DPA 1998 was repealed before the claim and no notice was served. The negligence claim was excluded by the statutory unfair dismissal regime. All claims disclosed no reasonable grounds and were struck out.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 480
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Tariq Alsaifi; First Defendant: Npower Limited; Second Defendant: Ms Colette Land; Third Defendant: Mr Stephen Banks
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (defamation, Negligence, Data Protection) / Summary Judgment/strike Out Applications
- Outcome
- Claim struck out; summary judgment for defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period in Defamation, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Qualified Privilege, Unfair Dismissal Exclusion, Data Protection Act 1998 S.10, Johnson V Unisys Exclusion Area
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Tariq Alsaifi
Claimant
Npower Limited
First Defendant
Ms Colette Land
Second Defendant
Mr Stephen Banks
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (defamation, Negligence, Data Protection) / Summary Judgment/strike Out Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defamation claim is time-barred under s.4A Limitation Act 1980
- 2 Whether the defamation claim discloses publication and serious harm
- 3 Whether the data protection claim discloses a valid cause of action under the Data Protection Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The defamation claim was time-barred under s.4A Limitation Act 1980, no publication to a third party was pleaded, and any internal publication would be protected by qualified privilege. The data protection claim failed as s.10 DPA 1998 was repealed before the claim and no notice was served. The negligence claim was excluded by the statutory unfair dismissal regime. All claims disclosed no reasonable grounds and were struck out.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out; summary judgment for defendants.
Orders
- Entirety of the claim struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4(2)(a)
- Summary judgment for defendants pursuant to CPR 24.2
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment