Green & Ors v Gaul & Ors [2006] EWCA Civ 1124 (28 July 2006)
Section 22(a) of the Limitation Act 1980 does not apply to the claim to remove Mrs Gaul as administratrix; claims for account and payment fall within section 21(1)(b) and are not time-barred; the defence of laches or acquiescence is not made out on the facts.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1124
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Green and others; Defendants/appellant: Gaul and others; Interested Party: Administratrix of the estate of Ivor Loftus, deceased
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Periods, Removal of Personal Representative, Laches, Acquiescence, Account of Estate, Administration of Estates
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Green and others
Claimants/respondents
Gaul and others
Defendants/appellant
Administratrix of the estate of Ivor Loftus, deceased
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 22(a) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims to remove a personal representative and for an account
- 2 Whether section 21(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for account and payment
- 3 Whether the defence of laches or acquiescence is available and made out
Ratio Decidendi
Section 22(a) of the Limitation Act 1980 does not apply to the claim to remove Mrs Gaul as administratrix; claims for account and payment fall within section 21(1)(b) and are not time-barred; the defence of laches or acquiescence is not made out on the facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Mrs Gaul removed as personal representative
- Miss Amanda King-Jones appointed as personal representative
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment