Nolan v Wright [2009] EWHC 305 (Ch) (26 February 2009)

Nolan v Wright [2009] EWHC 305 (Ch) (26 February 2009)

The claim to reopen the credit agreement as an extortionate credit bargain is statute-barred under section 8 of the Limitation Act 1980, following Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd, and the plea that the claim is statute-barred should be struck out. However, the case as a whole raises serious factual disputes and allegations of fraud, making it unsuitable for summary judgment and requiring a full trial.

Citation
[2009] EWHC 305 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Peter Nolan; Defendant/respondent: Graham Michael Wright
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 February 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Summary Judgment Refusal in Moneylending/credit Agreement Dispute / Appeal From District Judge's Refusal of Summary Judgment; Determination of Preliminary Limitation Issue
Outcome
Appeal dismissed save that the plea of limitation is struck out; matter to proceed to trial on remaining issues.
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Extortionate Credit Bargains, Summary Judgment, Consumer Credit Act 1974, Limitation Act 1980
Contract Law Consumer Credit Civil Procedure Limitation Periods Extortionate Credit Bargains Summary Judgment Consumer Credit Act 1974 Limitation Act 1980

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Nolan

Claimant/appellant

Graham Michael Wright

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Summary Judgment Refusal in Moneylending/credit Agreement Dispute / Appeal From District Judge's Refusal of Summary Judgment; Determination of Preliminary Limitation Issue

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a claim to reopen a credit agreement as an extortionate credit bargain under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 is statute-barred by limitation
  2. 2 Whether the District Judge erred in refusing summary judgment and sending the matter to trial

Ratio Decidendi

The claim to reopen the credit agreement as an extortionate credit bargain is statute-barred under section 8 of the Limitation Act 1980, following Rahman v Sterling Credit Ltd, and the plea that the claim is statute-barred should be struck out. However, the case as a whole raises serious factual disputes and allegations of fraud, making it unsuitable for summary judgment and requiring a full trial.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed save that the plea of limitation is struck out; matter to proceed to trial on remaining issues.

Orders

  • Plea that the claim is statute-barred is struck out as disclosing no reasonable ground of defence.
  • Appeal otherwise dismissed; case to proceed to trial.