DIRK VINCENT VAN HECK v GIAMBRONE & PARTNERS STUDIO LEGALE ASSOCIATO
The critical question is whether the proceedings in the court first seised (Palermo) had been finally determined in relation to jurisdiction. Based on expert evidence, the time limit for appeal was 30 days, which had expired, and the Italian court issued a certificate of res judicata. Therefore, there was a final determination, no lis alibi pendens, and the English proceedings should not be stayed.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Dirk Vincent Van Heck; Defendant/appellant: Giambrone & Partners Studio Legale Associato
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lis Alibi Pendens, Jurisdiction, EU Regulation 1215/2012 (brussels I Recast), Finality of Foreign Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dirk Vincent Van Heck
Claimant/respondent
Giambrone & Partners Studio Legale Associato
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English proceedings should be stayed under Article 29 of EU Regulation 1215/2012 due to lis alibi pendens with Italian proceedings
- 2 Whether a pending appeal in the first-seised (Italian) court prevents final determination for Article 29 purposes
- 3 Whether the time limit for appeal in the Italian proceedings was 30 days or 6 months, and its effect on finality
Ratio Decidendi
The critical question is whether the proceedings in the court first seised (Palermo) had been finally determined in relation to jurisdiction. Based on expert evidence, the time limit for appeal was 30 days, which had expired, and the Italian court issued a certificate of res judicata. Therefore, there was a final determination, no lis alibi pendens, and the English proceedings should not be stayed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Judge’s refusal to stay the English proceedings is upheld.
- No stay of the London Claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment