Judge, R (on the application of) v The First Secretary of State & Anor [2005] EWHC 887 (Admin) (28 April 2005)
The Secretary of State lawfully granted listed building consent for the relocation of the Sir Samuel Sadler statue, having sufficient information and acting within statutory powers; the consent properly covered the entire memorial, and the statutory code permits demolition and reconstruction (relocation) regardless of any realty/personalty distinction.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 887 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Judge; First Defendant: First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Middlesbrough Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Listed Building Consent, Planning (listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Statutory Interpretation, Costs in Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judge
Claimant
First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Middlesbrough Borough Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State's grant of listed building consent for relocation of the Sir Samuel Sadler statue was lawful under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990
- 2 Whether the Secretary of State had sufficient information to make the decision
- 3 Whether the consent properly covered the entirety of the memorial, including plinth and wall
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State lawfully granted listed building consent for the relocation of the Sir Samuel Sadler statue, having sufficient information and acting within statutory powers; the consent properly covered the entire memorial, and the statutory code permits demolition and reconstruction (relocation) regardless of any realty/personalty distinction.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay First Defendant's costs, summarily assessed at £6,280
- No order as to costs for Second Defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment