Municipio De Mariana & Ors v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor [2024] EWHC 953 (TCC) (18 April 2024)
The court found that the dominant purpose of the investigation and the preparation of the witness interview notes was to enable BHP to obtain legal advice and prepare for anticipated litigation, satisfying the requirements for litigation privilege. Therefore, the notes are protected and not subject to disclosure or further review.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 953 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimants: Município de Mariana & Others; Defendants: BHP Group (UK) Ltd; Third Party: VALE S. A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Ongoing Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure of Interview Notes
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Litigation Privilege Over Interview Notes, Disclosure Obligations, Dominant Purpose Test, Evidence Gathering in Anticipation of Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Município de Mariana & Others
Claimants
BHP Group (UK) Ltd
Defendants
VALE S. A.
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Application in Ongoing Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure of Interview Notes
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether witness interview notes prepared by Cleary Gottlieb for BHP are protected by litigation privilege
- 2 Whether the dominant purpose of the investigation was litigation or public reporting
- 3 Whether the court should order disclosure or review of the interview notes
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dominant purpose of the investigation and the preparation of the witness interview notes was to enable BHP to obtain legal advice and prepare for anticipated litigation, satisfying the requirements for litigation privilege. Therefore, the notes are protected and not subject to disclosure or further review.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- No order for disclosure or review of the witness interview notes
- No further review by Slaughter and May
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment