Society Of Lloyd's v Noel [2002] EWCA Civ 937 (20 June 2002)
Mrs Noel is bound by the Lloyd's Act 1982, the bye-laws, and the resolution and direction, which are sufficient to impose liability for the Equitas premium without the need for a post-1982 undertaking. All potential defences have been previously rejected or are irrelevant to the statutory basis of liability.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 937
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Society of Lloyd's; Defendant/applicant: Sally R Noel
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Lloyd's Act 1982, Bye Laws, Summary Judgment, Reinsurance to Close, Authority of Agents, Undertakings, Fraud Allegations, Unconscionability, Irrationality
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Society of Lloyd's
Claimant/respondent
Sally R Noel
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Noel is liable for the Equitas premium absent a post-1982 undertaking
- 2 Whether the Lloyd's Act 1982 and bye-laws bind Mrs Noel without her express consent
- 3 Whether any defences (fraud, unconscionability, irrationality) are available to Mrs Noel
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Noel is bound by the Lloyd's Act 1982, the bye-laws, and the resolution and direction, which are sufficient to impose liability for the Equitas premium without the need for a post-1982 undertaking. All potential defences have been previously rejected or are irrelevant to the statutory basis of liability.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment