Meisels v Lichtman & Anor [2008] EWHC 661 (QB) (09 April 2008)
The court finds, on balance of probabilities, that the sums transferred by the Claimant to YLJT on 23 December 2004 were loans and not gifts, based on the written agreement, absence of receipt or acknowledgment of donation, and the conduct of the parties. The Claimant is entitled to repayment from the Defendants as trustees of YLJT.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 661 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Moishe Meisels; First Defendant: Menachem Lichtman; Second Defendant: Berish Berger; Third Defendant: Solomon Weiss
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim for Recovery of Money / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; judgment for the Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Loan Vs Gift, Charitable Donations, Trustee Liability, Burden of Proof, Interpretation of Written Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moishe Meisels
Claimant
Menachem Lichtman
First Defendant
Berish Berger
Second Defendant
Solomon Weiss
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Recovery of Money / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Were the sums transferred by the Claimant to YLJT on 23 December 2004 loans or gifts?
- 2 Is the Claimant entitled to repayment from the Defendants as trustees of YLJT?
- 3 Does the written agreement evidence a loan or donation?
Ratio Decidendi
The court finds, on balance of probabilities, that the sums transferred by the Claimant to YLJT on 23 December 2004 were loans and not gifts, based on the written agreement, absence of receipt or acknowledgment of donation, and the conduct of the parties. The Claimant is entitled to repayment from the Defendants as trustees of YLJT.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; judgment for the Claimant.
Orders
- Defendants to repay the sum of £322,851.34 to the Claimant.
- Defendants to pay accrued interest of £37,786.87 up to date of issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment