South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor & Anor

South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor & Anor

Regulation 79 of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 1997 should be interpreted to impose liability on employers for contributions in respect of deferred members and pensioners, not only active members, to avoid injustice and further the legislative purpose of spreading pension liability fairly among employers.

Parties
Claimant: South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council; First Defendant: The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice; Second Defendant: The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 December 2007
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the Claimant
Legal Topics
Local Government Pension Scheme, Employer Contributions, Interpretation of Regulations, Liability for Deferred Members and Pensioners

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council

Claimant

The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice

First Defendant

The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Northumbria Magistrates’ Courts Committee (and its successor, the First Defendant) is liable to pay contributions to the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund in respect of former employees who are deferred members or pensioners under the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 1997

Ratio Decidendi

Regulation 79 of the Local Government Pension Scheme Regulations 1997 should be interpreted to impose liability on employers for contributions in respect of deferred members and pensioners, not only active members, to avoid injustice and further the legislative purpose of spreading pension liability fairly among employers.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the Claimant

Orders

  • First Defendant is liable to pay £214,000 to the Tyne and Wear Pension Fund
  • Declaration as to the true meaning of Regulation 79 to be made unless parties object