Williams v Patrick & Ors
Rule 45(3A) of the Parliamentary Rules does not apply to local government elections; the election was conducted substantially in accordance with the law; there was no evidence of any act or omission by the Returning Officer or his staff that affected the result; all allegations in the petition are rejected.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Vernon Williams; First Respondent: Sharon Patrick; First Respondent: Tom Rahilly; First Respondent: Rebecca Rennison; Second Respondent: Tim Shields
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Local Government Elections, Election Petitions, Returning Officer Duties, Election Procedure, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vernon Williams
Petitioner
Sharon Patrick
First Respondent
Tom Rahilly
First Respondent
Rebecca Rennison
First Respondent
Tim Shields
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the election for King's Park Ward was conducted substantially in accordance with the law as to elections
- 2 Whether rule 45(3A) of the Parliamentary Rules applies to local government elections
- 3 Whether any acts or omissions by the Returning Officer affected the result of the election
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 45(3A) of the Parliamentary Rules does not apply to local government elections; the election was conducted substantially in accordance with the law; there was no evidence of any act or omission by the Returning Officer or his staff that affected the result; all allegations in the petition are rejected.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- First respondents declared duly elected
- Certification to be sent to the High Court under section 145(2) of the Representation of the People Act 1983
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment