Dixon v Clement Jones Solicitors (a firm) [2004] EWCA Civ 1005 (08 July 2004)
In solicitor negligence claims arising from struck-out litigation, the court must assess the value of the lost opportunity by evaluating the prospects of success in the underlying claim, including causation, as a matter of chance rather than on the balance of probabilities. The trial judge's assessment that Mrs Dixon's lost claim had a 30% prospect of success was a proper exercise of this principle, and there was no basis to reduce it to zero or a negligible value.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1005
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Patricia Dixon; Defendant/appellant: Clement Jones Solicitors (A Firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Queen's Bench Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Loss of a Chance, Solicitors' Negligence, Assessment of Damages, Causation, Struck Out Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patricia Dixon
Claimant/respondent
Clement Jones Solicitors (A Firm)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Queen's Bench Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant lost a real and substantial chance to pursue a claim due to solicitors' negligence
- 2 How to assess damages for loss of a chance in struck-out litigation
- 3 Whether causation in such cases is determined on balance of probabilities or as a matter of prospects
Ratio Decidendi
In solicitor negligence claims arising from struck-out litigation, the court must assess the value of the lost opportunity by evaluating the prospects of success in the underlying claim, including causation, as a matter of chance rather than on the balance of probabilities. The trial judge's assessment that Mrs Dixon's lost claim had a 30% prospect of success was a proper exercise of this principle, and there was no basis to reduce it to zero or a negligible value.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellants to pay Respondent's costs of appeal
- Costs subject to detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment