Kaberry v Cartwright & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1272 (30 July 2002)
Permission to appeal is granted because there is arguable substance in the applicant's contention that the judge erred by conducting a 'mini trial' and that issues of foreseeability and causation require further argument.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1272
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Simon Edmund John Kaberry; Respondent/defendant: Freeth Cartwright (formerly Freeth Cartwright Hunt Dickens); Respondent/defendant: Oliver Thorold
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Loss of Chance, Negligence of Solicitors and Counsel, Summary Judgment, Foreseeability, Causation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Edmund John Kaberry
Applicant/claimant
Freeth Cartwright (formerly Freeth Cartwright Hunt Dickens)
Respondent/defendant
Oliver Thorold
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant lost a substantial chance to sue his former general practitioner due to the negligence of his solicitors and counsel
- 2 Whether the judge erred by conducting a 'mini trial' inappropriate for summary judgment applications
- 3 Whether issues of foreseeability and causation were properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because there is arguable substance in the applicant's contention that the judge erred by conducting a 'mini trial' and that issues of foreseeability and causation require further argument.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Application to rely on further evidence to be considered at the appeal hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment