Patel v National Westminster Bank Plc
The proposed amendments to the particulars of claim were unsustainable as there was no real prospect of success based on the available evidence that SCB would have advanced funds or RTL would have funded the account to honour the cheque. The court properly exercised its discretion to refuse permission for the late amendment.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Jignesh Patel; Defendant/respondent: National Westminster Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Refusing Permission to Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Lost Cheque, Amendment of Pleadings, Summary Judgment, Duty of Care by Bank, Loss of Chance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jignesh Patel
Claimant/appellant
National Westminster Bank PLC
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment Refusing Permission to Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted permission to amend particulars of claim to plead that the lost cheque would have been honoured
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments had any real prospect of success
- 3 Whether the court should exercise discretion to allow late amendments
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed amendments to the particulars of claim were unsustainable as there was no real prospect of success based on the available evidence that SCB would have advanced funds or RTL would have funded the account to honour the cheque. The court properly exercised its discretion to refuse permission for the late amendment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to amend particulars of claim refused
- Judgment entered for NatWest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment