Parks v Clout

Parks v Clout

The evidence advanced by Mr Parks, even if accepted, was insufficient to establish the existence and due execution of a valid will, or to support allegations of fraud. The claim was speculative and lacked the necessary detail and substance to proceed to trial. The appeal was dismissed as the lower courts were correct to strike out the claim.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Victor Alfred William Parks; Respondent/defendant: Roy Joseph Clout
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division, Judgment on Strike Out Application
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Lost Wills, Strike Out Applications, Intestacy, Fraud Allegations in Probate
Probate Civil Procedure Lost Wills Strike Out Applications Intestacy Fraud Allegations in Probate

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Victor Alfred William Parks

Appellant/claimant

Roy Joseph Clout

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Chancery Division, Judgment on Strike Out Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim that a valid will existed and was destroyed by the respondent should be struck out for having no realistic prospect of success
  2. 2 Whether circumstantial and hearsay evidence can establish the existence and due execution of a will
  3. 3 Whether the respondent acted fraudulently in obtaining letters of administration

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence advanced by Mr Parks, even if accepted, was insufficient to establish the existence and due execution of a valid will, or to support allegations of fraud. The claim was speculative and lacked the necessary detail and substance to proceed to trial. The appeal was dismissed as the lower courts were correct to strike out the claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Respondent's costs assessed at £3,000, payable within six weeks