Nuffield Health v London Borough of Merton [2021] EWCA Civ 826 (28 May 2021)
The Court held that, for mandatory rate relief under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988, the use of the premises themselves must satisfy the public benefit requirement as defined in the Charities Act 2011. Nuffield Health failed to demonstrate that its membership fees did not exclude those of modest means, and the limited services available to non-members were insufficient to constitute use of the premises for charitable purposes. Therefore, the premises were not being used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes as required by statute.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Civ 826
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Nuffield Health; Appellant/defendant: London Borough of Merton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Rate Relief, Charitable Purposes, Public Benefit Requirement, Non Domestic Rates, Charity Commission, Charities Act 2011, Local Government Finance Act 1988
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nuffield Health
Respondent/claimant
London Borough of Merton
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Nuffield Health's use of the premises qualifies as 'wholly or mainly used for charitable purposes' under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988
- 2 Whether the use of the premises satisfies the public benefit requirement under the Charities Act 2011
- 3 Whether charging market-rate membership fees excludes the poor and fails the public benefit test
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that, for mandatory rate relief under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988, the use of the premises themselves must satisfy the public benefit requirement as defined in the Charities Act 2011. Nuffield Health failed to demonstrate that its membership fees did not exclude those of modest means, and the limited services available to non-members were insufficient to constitute use of the premises for charitable purposes. Therefore, the premises were not being used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes as required by statute.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Declaration that Nuffield Health is not entitled to mandatory rate relief for the premises under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988
- Order for repayment of rates previously relieved to be set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment