Nuffield Health v London Borough of Merton
The Court of Appeal (majority) held that the statutory requirement under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 is satisfied if the charity uses the premises for its charitable purposes, as defined by its objects and charitable status, without a separate assessment of public benefit at each hereditament. However, if the public benefit requirement were to be assessed at the premises level, Nuffield Health failed to demonstrate that its membership fees did not exclude those of modest means, and the limited services to non-members were insufficient to satisfy the public benefit requirement.
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Nuffield Health; Appellant/defendant: London Borough of Merton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed (majority); if Ground 1 failed, appeal would be allowed on Ground 3.
- Legal Topics
- Mandatory Rate Relief, Charitable Purposes, Public Benefit Requirement, Non Domestic Rates, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nuffield Health
Respondent/claimant
London Borough of Merton
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Nuffield Health is entitled to mandatory relief from non-domestic rates under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988
- 2 Whether the use of the premises must be for the public benefit to qualify as charitable purposes
- 3 Whether charging market-rate membership fees excludes the poor and fails the public benefit requirement
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal (majority) held that the statutory requirement under section 43(6)(a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 is satisfied if the charity uses the premises for its charitable purposes, as defined by its objects and charitable status, without a separate assessment of public benefit at each hereditament. However, if the public benefit requirement were to be assessed at the premises level, Nuffield Health failed to demonstrate that its membership fees did not exclude those of modest means, and the limited services to non-members were insufficient to satisfy the public benefit requirement.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed (majority); if Ground 1 failed, appeal would be allowed on Ground 3.
Orders
- No mandatory rate relief for Nuffield Health at the Merton Abbey premises under section 43(6)(a) if public benefit is assessed at the premises level.
- No repayment of rates ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment