Cigna Insurance Company of Europe SA NV & Ors v Vural Ltd. & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 143 (15th February, 2002)

Cigna Insurance Company of Europe SA NV & Ors v Vural Ltd. & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 143 (15th February, 2002)

The appellant suffered no recoverable loss because the agreed sale price included elements unrelated to the market value of the property, and the master was correct to assess loss by reference to the market value. Further, the appellant failed to mitigate his loss, as alternative arrangements could have allowed the sale to proceed with adequate security for the claimants.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 143
Parties
Claimants/respondents: CIGNA Insurance Company of Europe SA NV and Others; First Defendant: Vural Limited; Second Defendant/appellant: Kenan Vural Akyuz
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (commercial Court) on Assessment of Damages Following Discontinuance and Inquiry Into Damages on Undertakings
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Mareva Injunction, Assessment of Damages, Undertaking as to Damages, Mitigation of Loss, Foreseeability of Loss
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Insurance Law Mareva Injunction Assessment of Damages Undertaking as to Damages Mitigation of Loss Foreseeability of Loss

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CIGNA Insurance Company of Europe SA NV and Others

Claimants/respondents

Vural Limited

First Defendant

Kenan Vural Akyuz

Second Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (commercial Court) on Assessment of Damages Following Discontinuance and Inquiry Into Damages on Undertakings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was entitled to substantial damages for loss of opportunity to sell property at an agreed price higher than market value due to a Mareva injunction and inhibition on title
  2. 2 Whether damages should be assessed on the basis of the agreed sale price or market value
  3. 3 Whether the appellant failed to mitigate his loss

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant suffered no recoverable loss because the agreed sale price included elements unrelated to the market value of the property, and the master was correct to assess loss by reference to the market value. Further, the appellant failed to mitigate his loss, as alternative arrangements could have allowed the sale to proceed with adequate security for the claimants.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; order as drafted by counsel