JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov & Ors [2009] EWHC 2833 (QB) (16 October 2009)
The affidavits provided by the first defendant are inadequate for the purpose of enabling the claimants to police the freezing order; cross-examination is a just and necessary alternative, and should occur before the return date to avoid unfairness to the claimants.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 2833 (QB)
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: JSC BTA Bank; First Respondent/defendant: Mukhtar Ablyazov; Respondents/defendants: Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application in Ongoing Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Cross Examination Order
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Mareva Injunction, Cross Examination on Affidavits, Disclosure of Assets
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JSC BTA Bank
Applicant/claimant
Mukhtar Ablyazov
First Respondent/defendant
Ors
Respondents/defendants
Procedural Posture
Application in Ongoing Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Cross Examination Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first defendant should be ordered to attend for cross-examination on affidavits as to assets and answers to Schedule C questions
- 2 Whether the timing of cross-examination should be before or after the return date for the freezing order
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavits provided by the first defendant are inadequate for the purpose of enabling the claimants to police the freezing order; cross-examination is a just and necessary alternative, and should occur before the return date to avoid unfairness to the claimants.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- First defendant to attend for cross-examination on affidavits as to assets and Schedule C answers on 27 October 2009
- Defendant to pay costs of this application on the standard basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment