Heath Lambert Ltd v Sociedad De Corretaje De Seguros & Anor [2004] EWCA Civ 792 (23 June 2004)
The clause 'Warranted premium payable on cash basis to London Underwriters within 90 days of attachment' means the premium was not payable until the expiry of 90 days from attachment, so the broker's cause of action did not accrue until then. Therefore, the claim for premium in respect of the extension was not time barred.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 792
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Heath Lambert Limited; First Defendant/appellant: Sociedad de Corretaje de Seguros (SCORT); Second Defendant/appellant: Banesco Seguros CA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (commercial Court)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Marine Insurance, Limitation of Actions, Reinsurance, Brokers' Liability, Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Heath Lambert Limited
Claimant/respondent
Sociedad de Corretaje de Seguros (SCORT)
First Defendant/appellant
Banesco Seguros CA
Second Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (commercial Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 When does a broker's cause of action for unpaid premium accrue under a marine reinsurance contract with a 'premium payable within 90 days of attachment' clause?
- 2 Whether the claim for premium in respect of the extension from July to December 1996 was time barred.
Ratio Decidendi
The clause 'Warranted premium payable on cash basis to London Underwriters within 90 days of attachment' means the premium was not payable until the expiry of 90 days from attachment, so the broker's cause of action did not accrue until then. Therefore, the claim for premium in respect of the extension was not time barred.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- First Appellant to pay 50% of Respondent's costs of appeals
- Second Appellant to pay remaining 50% of Respondent's costs of appeals
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment