Airwave Solutions Ltd & Ors v Competition and Markets Authority & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 54 (30 January 2025)

Airwave Solutions Ltd & Ors v Competition and Markets Authority & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 54 (30 January 2025)

The Court found the CAT did not err in law. The CMA's analysis of competition and profitability post-expiry of the PFI Agreement was rational and within its discretion. The CAT correctly upheld the CMA's findings that Motorola had unconstrained monopoly power during the extension period, resulting in supernormal profits and customer detriment. The charge control order was a lawful and proportionate remedy.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Civ 54
Parties
1st Appellant: Airwave Solutions Limited; 2nd Appellant: Motorola Solutions UK Limited; 3rd Appellant: Motorola Solutions, Inc.; 1st Respondent: Competition and Markets Authority; 2nd Respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal (judicial Review) / Judgment on Permission and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Market Investigation Reference, Adverse Effect on Competition, Judicial Review, Charge Control Order, Asset Valuation, Supernormal Profits, Remedies for Competition Distortion
Competition Law Public Procurement Administrative Law Market Investigation Reference Adverse Effect on Competition Judicial Review Charge Control Order Asset Valuation +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Airwave Solutions Limited

1st Appellant

Motorola Solutions UK Limited

2nd Appellant

Motorola Solutions, Inc.

3rd Appellant

Competition and Markets Authority

1st Respondent

Secretary of State for the Home Department

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Competition Appeal Tribunal (judicial Review) / Judgment on Permission and Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the CMA failed to consider dynamic, long-term competition between Airwave Network and ESN
  2. 2 Whether the CMA's profitability analysis was irrational or failed to consider material factors

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found the CAT did not err in law. The CMA's analysis of competition and profitability post-expiry of the PFI Agreement was rational and within its discretion. The CAT correctly upheld the CMA's findings that Motorola had unconstrained monopoly power during the extension period, resulting in supernormal profits and customer detriment. The charge control order was a lawful and proportionate remedy.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • CAT judgment upheld