Wiltshire Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2015] EWHC 1261 (Admin) (05 April 2015)
In Appeal A, the final report on the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy was a material consideration because it resolved objections to the housing requirement figure and could have affected the inspector's assessment of housing need, a main issue in the appeal. The inspector was not given the opportunity to consider it due to administrative failure by the Planning Inspectorate. There was a real possibility that consideration of the report might have led to a different outcome. In Appeal B, although the inspector erred in not considering the report, housing need was a subsidiary issue and there was no real possibility it would have affected the outcome, so the decision should not be quashed.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 1261 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Wiltshire Council; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant (co/416/2015): Heron Land Developments Limited; Third Defendant (co/416/2015): Gallagher UK Limited; Fourth Defendant (co/416/2015): Gallagher Estates Limited; Second Defendant (co/627/2015): Mr S Cooper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / High Court Judgment on Applications to Quash Planning Appeal Decisions
- Outcome
- Appeal A: Decision quashed. Appeal B: Claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Material Considerations in Planning, Judicial Review Under S.288 TCPA 1990, Housing Land Supply, Procedural Fairness, Emerging Development Plans
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wiltshire Council
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Heron Land Developments Limited
Second Defendant (co/416/2015)
Gallagher UK Limited
Third Defendant (co/416/2015)
Gallagher Estates Limited
Fourth Defendant (co/416/2015)
Mr S Cooper
Second Defendant (co/627/2015)
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / High Court Judgment on Applications to Quash Planning Appeal Decisions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Planning Inspectors failed to consider a material consideration (the final report on the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy) in determining planning appeals.
- 2 Whether such failure justified quashing the appeal decisions.
Ratio Decidendi
In Appeal A, the final report on the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy was a material consideration because it resolved objections to the housing requirement figure and could have affected the inspector's assessment of housing need, a main issue in the appeal. The inspector was not given the opportunity to consider it due to administrative failure by the Planning Inspectorate. There was a real possibility that consideration of the report might have led to a different outcome. In Appeal B, although the inspector erred in not considering the report, housing need was a subsidiary issue and there was no real possibility it would have affected the outcome, so the decision should not be quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal A: Decision quashed. Appeal B: Claim dismissed.
Orders
- The decision letter in Appeal A (CO/416/2015) is quashed and the matter remitted for redetermination.
- The claim in Appeal B (CO/627/2015) is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment