World Society for the Protection of Animals v Welsh Ministers & Ors
The Minister lawfully weighed the economic benefits of the proposed development against the considerable harm to heritage assets, gave the required special weight to the statutory duty under section 66(1) of the Listed Buildings Act, and provided adequate reasons; none of the grounds for quashing the decision were made out.
- Parties
- Claimant: The World Society for the Protection of Animals; First Defendant: The Welsh Ministers; Second Defendant: Powys County Council; Third Defendant: Fraser Jones
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Material Considerations in Planning, Statutory Duty Under Listed Buildings Act, Wednesbury Unreasonableness, Economic Benefits in Planning, Reasons for Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The World Society for the Protection of Animals
Claimant
The Welsh Ministers
First Defendant
Powys County Council
Second Defendant
Fraser Jones
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister failed to take into account material considerations
- 2 Whether the Minister misunderstood or misapplied section 66(1) of the Listed Buildings Act
- 3 Whether the Minister's decision was irrational (Wednesbury unreasonableness)
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister lawfully weighed the economic benefits of the proposed development against the considerable harm to heritage assets, gave the required special weight to the statutory duty under section 66(1) of the Listed Buildings Act, and provided adequate reasons; none of the grounds for quashing the decision were made out.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment