Jones & Anor, R (on the application of) v North Warwickshire Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 315 (1 March 2001)

Jones & Anor, R (on the application of) v North Warwickshire Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 315 (1 March 2001)

No reasonable council could have treated the Coventry Road site as a relevant material consideration in this case; therefore, the council's failure to consider it did not constitute an error of law.

Citation
[2001] EWCA Civ 315
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Scott Jones (by his litigation friend Vicky Jones); Claimant/respondent: Thomas Howe (by his litigation friend Lynn Howe); Defendant/appellant: North Warwickshire Borough Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; application for judicial review dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Material Considerations in Planning Applications, Duty to Consider Alternative Sites, Judicial Review of Local Authority Decisions
Administrative Law Planning Law Material Considerations in Planning Applications Duty to Consider Alternative Sites Judicial Review of Local Authority Decisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Scott Jones (by his litigation friend Vicky Jones)

Claimant/respondent

Thomas Howe (by his litigation friend Lynn Howe)

Claimant/respondent

North Warwickshire Borough Council

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the local planning authority was obliged to consider the availability of an alternative site as a material consideration when granting planning permission
  2. 2 Whether failure to consider the alternative site constituted an error of law

Ratio Decidendi

No reasonable council could have treated the Coventry Road site as a relevant material consideration in this case; therefore, the council's failure to consider it did not constitute an error of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; application for judicial review dismissed; cross-appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal allowed and the application dismissed
  • Cross-appeal dismissed