Whiteleys (A Firm) v Trafalgar Consultancy Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 503 (05 May 2006)
Where a professional advisor is instructed to calculate on a notional 53-week year to account for double time on bank holidays, and fails to do so, damages are measured by the difference between a 52-week and 53-week calculation, not by the actual number of bank holidays, as this reflects the instructions and pleaded case.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 503
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Whiteleys (A Firm); Defendant/appellant: Trafalgar Consultancy Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Measure of Damages, Professional Duty of Care, Breach of Contract, Instructions to Professional Advisors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Whiteleys (A Firm)
Claimant/respondent
Trafalgar Consultancy Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent (accountant) was negligent in failing to factor double time for bank holidays into tender calculations as instructed by the appellant
- 2 What is the correct measure of damages for the appellant's loss resulting from the respondent's breach of duty
Ratio Decidendi
Where a professional advisor is instructed to calculate on a notional 53-week year to account for double time on bank holidays, and fails to do so, damages are measured by the difference between a 52-week and 53-week calculation, not by the actual number of bank holidays, as this reflects the instructions and pleaded case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Judgment on the counterclaim for £90,933 plus interest in favour of the appellant (Trafalgar Consultancy Limited)
- Parties to agree the figure for interest and submit an agreed order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment