Garner v Salford City Council & Anor [2013] EWHC 1573 (QB) (13 June 2013)
The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that she was exposed to asbestos fibres as a result of the defendants' demolition activities, as the evidence showed that precautions were taken to prevent the release of asbestos dust and the likelihood of exposure was minimal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 1573 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Penelope Garner; First Defendant: Salford City Council; Second Defendant: P McGuiness and Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/negligence / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; judgment for the defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Mesothelioma, Asbestos Exposure, Causation, Negligence, Occupational Disease
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Penelope Garner
Claimant
Salford City Council
First Defendant
P McGuiness and Company Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/negligence / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was exposed to asbestos fibres as a result of the defendants' demolition activities
- 2 Whether such exposure caused or materially increased the risk of mesothelioma
- 3 Whether the defendants breached their duty of care in the demolition process
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that she was exposed to asbestos fibres as a result of the defendants' demolition activities, as the evidence showed that precautions were taken to prevent the release of asbestos dust and the likelihood of exposure was minimal.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; judgment for the defendants.
Orders
- Claim dismissed
- Judgment for the defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment