Martin & Anor v The Coal Authority [2005] EWLands LCA_197_2000 (06 July 2005)
Demolition and rebuilding were not necessary to remedy the mining subsidence damage; only specified remedial works were required. Compensation is limited to the reasonable cost of those works and associated professional fees, as determined by the Tribunal.
- Citation
- [2005] EWLands LCA_197_2000
- Parties
- Claimant: John Barry Digby Martin; Claimant: Maureen Edith Martin; Compensating Authority: The Coal Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Claim Under Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991 / Final Decision After Hearing
- Outcome
- Compensation awarded to claimants for cost of specified remedial works and professional fees; claim for demolition and rebuilding rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Mining Subsidence, Compensation for Property Damage, Remedial Works, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Barry Digby Martin
Claimant
Maureen Edith Martin
Claimant
The Coal Authority
Compensating Authority
Procedural Posture
Compensation Claim Under Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991 / Final Decision After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether demolition and rebuilding of the bungalow was necessary to remedy mining subsidence damage to the claimants' reasonable satisfaction under section 6(2)(a) of the Coal Mining Subsidence Act 1991
- 2 What remedial works and associated costs are compensable under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
Demolition and rebuilding were not necessary to remedy the mining subsidence damage; only specified remedial works were required. Compensation is limited to the reasonable cost of those works and associated professional fees, as determined by the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Compensation awarded to claimants for cost of specified remedial works and professional fees; claim for demolition and rebuilding rejected.
Orders
- The Coal Authority to pay the claimants £53,958 as compensation for remedial works and professional fees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment