Gijsbert Lucas Van Buuren v The Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Constabulary & Ors

Gijsbert Lucas Van Buuren v The Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Constabulary & Ors

There are triable issues regarding misfeasance in public office, limitation, and causation; summary judgment and strike out are inappropriate as the defendants may have a substantive defence and further evidence/disclosure is required.

Parties
Claimant/respondent/appellant: Gijsbert Lucas van Buuren; Defendant/appellant/respondent: The Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Constabulary; Defendant/appellant/respondent: The Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary; Defendant/appellant/respondent: The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire; Defendant/appellant/respondent: The Independent Office for Police Conduct
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
31 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From King's Bench Division, Post Strike Out and Summary Judgment Applications
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part by consent; remainder dismissed.
Legal Topics
Misfeasance in Public Office, Limitation Period, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Police Conduct, Disclosure
Tort Public Law Civil Procedure Misfeasance in Public Office Limitation Period Summary Judgment Strike Out Police Conduct +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gijsbert Lucas van Buuren

Claimant/respondent/appellant

The Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire Constabulary

Defendant/appellant/respondent

The Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary

Defendant/appellant/respondent

The Chief Constable of Bedfordshire

Defendant/appellant/respondent

The Independent Office for Police Conduct

Defendant/appellant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From King's Bench Division, Post Strike Out and Summary Judgment Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants committed misfeasance in public office by failing to investigate and allegedly falsifying records of a road accident
  2. 2 Whether summary judgment should be granted to the claimant
  3. 3 Whether the defence should be struck out

Ratio Decidendi

There are triable issues regarding misfeasance in public office, limitation, and causation; summary judgment and strike out are inappropriate as the defendants may have a substantive defence and further evidence/disclosure is required.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part by consent; remainder dismissed.

Orders

  • Withdrawal of the Constabularies' appeal
  • Reinstatement of all claims for trial