Jenkins v JCP Solicitors Ltd [2019] EWHC 852 (QB) (04 April 2019)
The appellant made a mistake as to the name, not identity, of the defendant; the Court has jurisdiction to allow substitution of the LLP for the Company in respect of the October/November 2011 advice, but not for the April 2011 advice as the claim is arguably statute-barred.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 852
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Huw Morgan Jenkins; Respondent/defendant: JCP Solicitors Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Post Order of District Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Mistake in Party Identification, Limitation Period, Substitution of Parties, Negligence, Contractual Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Huw Morgan Jenkins
Appellant/claimant
JCP Solicitors Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Post Order of District Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant can substitute John Collins & Partners LLP for JCP Solicitors Limited as defendant after limitation period
- 2 Whether the claim for negligent advice in April 2011 is statute-barred
- 3 Nature of mistake in party identification under CPR 19.5
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant made a mistake as to the name, not identity, of the defendant; the Court has jurisdiction to allow substitution of the LLP for the Company in respect of the October/November 2011 advice, but not for the April 2011 advice as the claim is arguably statute-barred.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Substitution of John Collins & Partners LLP as defendant in respect of October/November 2011 advice permitted
- Permission to withdraw concession on limitation granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment