Jenkins v JCP Solicitors Ltd [2019] EWHC 852 (QB) (04 April 2019)
The mistake in naming JCP Solicitors Limited instead of John Collins & Partners LLP was a mistake as to name, not identity, based on contemporaneous documents and intention to sue the entity providing advice in 2011. The Court has jurisdiction to allow substitution under CPR 19.5 for the October/November 2011 advice. The District Judge erred in law regarding both the nature of the mistake and the exercise of discretion. Substitution is permitted for the October/November 2011 advice, but not for the April 2011 advice, as the respondent has an arguable limitation defence.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 852 (QB)
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Huw Morgan Jenkins; Respondent/defendant: JCP Solicitors Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Post Order of District Judge
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Mistake in Party Identification, Limitation Period, Substitution of Parties, Negligent Legal Advice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Huw Morgan Jenkins
Appellant/claimant
JCP Solicitors Limited
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Queen's Bench Division, Post Order of District Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mistake in naming JCP Solicitors Limited instead of John Collins & Partners LLP was as to name or identity
- 2 Whether substitution of LLP for the Company is permitted under CPR 19.5 after expiry of limitation
- 3 Whether the claim for negligent advice in April 2011 is statute-barred
Ratio Decidendi
The mistake in naming JCP Solicitors Limited instead of John Collins & Partners LLP was a mistake as to name, not identity, based on contemporaneous documents and intention to sue the entity providing advice in 2011. The Court has jurisdiction to allow substitution under CPR 19.5 for the October/November 2011 advice. The District Judge erred in law regarding both the nature of the mistake and the exercise of discretion. Substitution is permitted for the October/November 2011 advice, but not for the April 2011 advice, as the respondent has an arguable limitation defence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Substitution of John Collins & Partners LLP as defendant in respect of October/November 2011 advice permitted
- Permission to withdraw concession on limitation granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment