Monro v HM Revenue & Customs [2007] EWHC 114 (Ch) (01 February 2007)
A common law restitutionary claim for recovery of overpaid tax is precluded where the statutory regime under s.33 Taxes Management Act 1970 applies, even if the statutory remedy is unavailable due to time limits or exclusions such as s.33(2A). The statutory scheme is intended to be exclusive in such circumstances, and no parallel common law remedy exists for tax paid under a mistake of law or pursuant to an unlawful demand when the payment was made in accordance with the practice generally prevailing at the time.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 114 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Angus Monro; Defendants: The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Restitutionary Claim for Repayment of Tax / High Court (chancery Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mistake of Law, Unlawful Demand, Statutory Remedies, Self Assessment Tax Returns
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angus Monro
Claimant
The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Restitutionary Claim for Repayment of Tax / High Court (chancery Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a taxpayer can recover overpaid tax under a common law restitutionary claim when statutory remedies are precluded by s.33(2A) Taxes Management Act 1970
- 2 Whether tax paid pursuant to a self-assessment based on prevailing practice, later found to be mistaken in law, is recoverable at common law as money paid under a mistake or pursuant to an unlawful demand
Ratio Decidendi
A common law restitutionary claim for recovery of overpaid tax is precluded where the statutory regime under s.33 Taxes Management Act 1970 applies, even if the statutory remedy is unavailable due to time limits or exclusions such as s.33(2A). The statutory scheme is intended to be exclusive in such circumstances, and no parallel common law remedy exists for tax paid under a mistake of law or pursuant to an unlawful demand when the payment was made in accordance with the practice generally prevailing at the time.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment