Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea v The Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government [2017] EWHC 1704 (Admin) (13 July 2017)
The inspector made a material mistake of fact in calculating housing land supply by double-counting vacant units returning to use, which led to an erroneous finding of significant oversupply. This mistake played a material part in the inspector's reasoning and decision, rendering the decision unfair and outside the powers of the Act. The court cannot be satisfied that the decision would have been the same absent the error, and thus the decision must be quashed.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1704 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Aref Lahham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Final Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Inspector's Decision
- Outcome
- Application allowed; decision quashed
- Legal Topics
- Mistake of Fact in Administrative Decisions, Judicial Review of Planning Decisions, Housing Land Supply Calculation, Materiality of Error in Planning Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Claimant
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Aref Lahham
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / Final Judgment on Application to Quash Planning Inspector's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector made a material mistake of fact in calculating housing land supply
- 2 Whether the inspector's error played a material part in the decision to allow the appeal against refusal of planning permission
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector made a material mistake of fact in calculating housing land supply by double-counting vacant units returning to use, which led to an erroneous finding of significant oversupply. This mistake played a material part in the inspector's reasoning and decision, rendering the decision unfair and outside the powers of the Act. The court cannot be satisfied that the decision would have been the same absent the error, and thus the decision must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; decision quashed
Orders
- The Secretary of State's decision dated 3 February 2017 is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment