Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea v The Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government [2017] EWHC 1703 (Admin) (13 July 2017)
The inspector's mistake of fact in double-counting vacant units returning to use played a material part in the reasoning and decision, resulting in unfairness; therefore, the Secretary of State's decision must be quashed.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1703 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea; First Defendant: The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Charles Noell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (section 288 TCPA 1990) / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; decision quashed
- Legal Topics
- Mistake of Fact in Planning Decisions, Housing Land Supply Calculation, Judicial Review of Planning Inspector Decisions, Section 288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Claimant
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Charles Noell
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (section 288 TCPA 1990) / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the planning inspector made a material mistake of fact in calculating housing land supply by double-counting vacant units returning to use
- 2 Whether the inspector made a further mistake of fact by double-counting recent planning permissions in the housing supply assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The inspector's mistake of fact in double-counting vacant units returning to use played a material part in the reasoning and decision, resulting in unfairness; therefore, the Secretary of State's decision must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; decision quashed
Orders
- The Secretary of State's decision of 17 January 2017 is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment