Various 3rd Wave Claimants v MGN Ltd
Some articles were struck out or summary judgment granted where the information was disclosed by the claimant, was aired in open court, or was too trivial to attract privacy protection. For other articles, the absence of positive evidence from the defendant as to the source, and the need for disclosure, meant that summary judgment or strikeout was inappropriate at this stage. Prior publication alone does not justify strikeout. Claims based solely on publication of information already in the public domain or disclosed by the claimant are not maintainable as misuse of private information.
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Various 3rd Wave Claimants; Defendant/applicant: MGN Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Privacy/misuse of Private Information / Summary Judgment and Strikeout Application
- Outcome
- Partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Misuse of Private Information, Summary Judgment, Strikeout Applications, Prior Publication, Open Justice, Damages for Privacy Invasion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Various 3rd Wave Claimants
Claimants/respondents
MGN Limited
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Privacy/misuse of Private Information / Summary Judgment and Strikeout Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certain articles pleaded by claimants should be struck out or disposed of by summary judgment as not disclosing a viable cause of action for misuse of private information
- 2 Whether prior publication or disclosure in open court destroys privacy rights
- 3 Whether the articles were the product of unlawful information gathering
Ratio Decidendi
Some articles were struck out or summary judgment granted where the information was disclosed by the claimant, was aired in open court, or was too trivial to attract privacy protection. For other articles, the absence of positive evidence from the defendant as to the source, and the need for disclosure, meant that summary judgment or strikeout was inappropriate at this stage. Prior publication alone does not justify strikeout. Claims based solely on publication of information already in the public domain or disclosed by the claimant are not maintainable as misuse of private information.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed
Orders
- Summary judgment or strikeout granted in respect of certain articles where information was disclosed by the claimant, aired in open court, or too trivial to be actionable.
- Applications dismissed in respect of other articles; those claims survive to trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment