Aslam v Tahmasaby [2001] EWCA Civ 1961 (13 December 2001)
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a refusal of permission to appeal under section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999. The applicant failed to demonstrate any appealable point or unfairness in the hearing, and the judge exercised his discretion properly.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1961
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Zul Puarnian Aslam; Defendant/respondent: Mohshen Tahmasaby
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Mitigation of Loss, Damages, Jurisdiction, Fair Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zul Puarnian Aslam
Claimant/applicant
Mohshen Tahmasaby
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in applying the principles of mitigation of loss
- 2 Whether the applicant was afforded a fair hearing
- 3 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from refusal of permission to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a refusal of permission to appeal under section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999. The applicant failed to demonstrate any appealable point or unfairness in the hearing, and the judge exercised his discretion properly.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment