Barrowfen Properties Ltd v Patel & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 39 (23 January 2025)

Barrowfen Properties Ltd v Patel & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 39 (23 January 2025)

The increased developer's profit from the revised development scheme was causally linked to the breaches and formed part of a continuous transaction; therefore, it must be credited against damages for loss of rental income, without deduction for future finance costs, as Barrowfen could sell the property at any time. The deduction for capital appreciation must be made before applying the loss of a chance percentage. Interest as damages runs to the date of judgment, not just to the date of completion of the revised scheme, but the award of interest must be calculated correctly to avoid overcompensation.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Civ 39
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Barrowfen Properties Limited; First Defendant/respondent: Girish Dahyabhai Patel; Second Defendant/respondent: Stevens & Bolton LLP; Third Defendant/respondent: Barrowfen Properties II Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Mitigation of Loss, Equitable Compensation, Damages Assessment, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Professional Negligence, Causation, Interest as Damages, Loss of a Chance, Collateral Benefits
Commercial Law Professional Negligence Equity and Trusts Company Law Mitigation of Loss Equitable Compensation Damages Assessment Breach of Fiduciary Duty +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barrowfen Properties Limited

Claimant/appellant

Girish Dahyabhai Patel

First Defendant/respondent

Stevens & Bolton LLP

Second Defendant/respondent

Barrowfen Properties II Limited

Third Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether increased developer's profit from a revised development scheme must be credited against damages for loss of rental income caused by breach of duty/negligence
  2. 2 Whether future finance costs should be deducted from the increased developer's profit when assessing mitigation benefits
  3. 3 Whether the deduction for capital appreciation should be made before or after applying the loss of a chance percentage

Ratio Decidendi

The increased developer's profit from the revised development scheme was causally linked to the breaches and formed part of a continuous transaction; therefore, it must be credited against damages for loss of rental income, without deduction for future finance costs, as Barrowfen could sell the property at any time. The deduction for capital appreciation must be made before applying the loss of a chance percentage. Interest as damages runs to the date of judgment, not just to the date of completion of the revised scheme, but the award of interest must be calculated correctly to avoid overcompensation.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Barrowfen's appeal on assessment of mitigation benefits dismissed
  • S&B's cross-appeal on timing of deduction and interest calculation allowed in part