The National Crime Agency v N & Anor (Rev 1) [2017] EWCA Civ 253 (07 April 2017)
The statutory regime under POCA is not ousted by the court's jurisdiction to grant interim relief, but the statutory procedure is highly relevant and usually decisive in the exercise of discretion. Interim relief should not disapply the consent regime except in exceptional circumstances, which were not established in this case. The judge's reliance on NCA consent and absence of evidence of criminal property was erroneous; consent does not equate to absence of suspicion or evidence. The Orders granting interim declarations and injunctions were wrong in law and should not have been made.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 253
- Parties
- Interested Party/appellant: The National Crime Agency; Claimant/first Respondent: N; Defendant/second Respondent: Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Orders set aside
- Legal Topics
- Money Laundering, Interim Relief, Proceeds of Crime Act, Consent Regime, Banking Mandate, Injunctions, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The National Crime Agency
Interested Party/appellant
N
Claimant/first Respondent
Royal Bank of Scotland plc
Defendant/second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court may grant interim relief that disapplies the consent regime under POCA
- 2 Jurisdiction of the court to grant interim injunctions and declarations in the context of POCA
- 3 Interpretation of 'criminal property' under POCA section 340
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory regime under POCA is not ousted by the court's jurisdiction to grant interim relief, but the statutory procedure is highly relevant and usually decisive in the exercise of discretion. Interim relief should not disapply the consent regime except in exceptional circumstances, which were not established in this case. The judge's reliance on NCA consent and absence of evidence of criminal property was erroneous; consent does not equate to absence of suspicion or evidence. The Orders granting interim declarations and injunctions were wrong in law and should not have been made.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Orders set aside
Orders
- Orders 1, 2, and 3 granting interim mandatory injunctions and declarations are set aside
- No relief granted to N; statutory POCA regime applies
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment